See who is already coming to #socialrecruiting summit in November!

Blog Network

SittingXlegged

Corporate recruitment: what works and what doesn't plus other musings.

Tactical Strategy or Strategic Tactics? follow this blog post

For years now I've heard people use the adjectives strategic and tactical. In most cases I believe that people who use these terms are unclear about what they mean. I'm certainly unclear too. Often they are used interchangeably. First, let's look at what the Random House Dictionary says:

stra-te-gic
1. pertaining to, characterized by, or of the nature of strategy: strategic movements.
2. important in or essential to strategy.
3. (of an action, as a military operation or a move in a game) forming an integral part of a stratagem: a strategic move in a game of chess.
4. Military.
a. intended to render the enemy incapable of making war, as by the destruction of materials, factories, etc.: a strategic bombing mission.
b. essential to the conduct of a war: Copper is a strategic material.

tac-ti-cal
1. of or pertaining to tactics, esp. military or naval tactics.
2. characterized by skillful tactics or adroit maneuvering or procedure: tactical movements.
3. of or pertaining to a maneuver or plan of action designed as an expedient toward gaining a desired end or temporary advantage.
4. expedient; calculated.
5. prudent; politic.

So they are different? Right?

Not so fast! Just for fun, I checked the definitions of the corresponding nouns:

strat-e-gy
1. a plan, method, or series of maneuvers or stratagems for obtaining a specific goal or result: a strategy for getting ahead in the world.

tac-tic
1. a plan, procedure, or expedient for promoting a desired end or result.

The nouns are so close in meaning that I can easily see my source of confusion. One has to do with obtaining a specific result and the other has to do with promoting a desired result.

So what?

For me tactics are short term and strategies are long term. I think of a line with tactics at the start and strategies at the other end. Everything we do is somewhere on that line but very little of what we do is at one end or the other. To put that another way, everything we do is somewhat tactical and somewhat strategic.

Do you have any thoughts on the matter? Care to share? Could be an interesting discussion...

8 comments

Log in or register to post a reply.

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Simon, I think Robin's response is a perfect reply to your question.  As a recruiter, a blend of working strategically and tactically is a must.  Strategy should guide your short-term, mid-term and long-term game plan for greatest success and the tactics you apply enable you to carry out the plan.  As an HR Manager, to reference the Civil War analogy, I use my foot soldiers to carry out the tactics required to move my strategy forward.  Tactics are the step by step process but don't enable you to map the future.  Strategy enables you to create your game plan and requires the ability to think ahead, be flexible to accomodate necessary changes and successfully make executive decisions at critical times.

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Hi Jim,

    Well put! So as an HR Manager, what would be an example of a strategy and the corresponding tactics used to achieve it?

    Cheers!

    Simon

  • 2 points 6 months ago

    Strategy is all about the big picture; tactics are utilized to achieve the strategy.  Tactics are really often a subset of strategy and more about the details, although you can have a tactical maneuver without having a well thought out strategy and vice versa. 

    The Civil War is great material to really understanding the two, so I recommend the following book Cigars, Whiskey, and Winning by Al Kaltman:

    http://www.amazon.com/Cigars-Whiskey-Winning-Leadership-Lessons/dp/073520022X

    and the following link: http://www.civilwarhome.com/strategyandtactics.htm

    Political messages aside, these present day articles display the differences between strategy and tactics, especially the first one:

    http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/27/america%E2%80%99s-environmental-policy-tactic-or-strategy/

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-bergthold/obama-argues-strategy-mcc_b_112913.html

    http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/on_strategy_and_tactics.php

     

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Hi Robin,

    I'm beginning to think that military examples work and that makes sense since that's where the terms originated. Outside of the military I think it's less clear. Thoughts?

    Thanks,

    Simon

  • 2 points 6 months ago

    Hello Simon, 

    The way it was explained to me many years ago and the I find easy to remember:

    Strategy:  When you are planning how and when to drop the bomb.

    Tactics:  When you drop the bomb.

     

     

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Hi Lyn,

    Thanks for your comment. Not sure I can agree with your definition. What would be a business equivalent?

    Cheers!

    Simon

  • 2 points 6 months ago

    Hi Simon,

    Great question. Having served in the US Marine Corps, I'm quite familiar with both strategy and tactics. While you bring up a great semantic argument, the use of these phrases is really pretty simple. While executing an overall strategy (the war), there are certain tactics utilized (the battle). I don't view strategies or tactics as either short or long-term - both can be either. For me, strategy deals with the overall objectives and tactics are how we get things done. While both words are close in definition, they can mean very different things in today's business environment. I'm sure I'm stating what you already know, but it's just my two cents worth.

    Semper Fi,

    Brenden

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Hi Brenden,

    Great comment and totally clear! Both terms make perfect sense in a military context. I think they make less sense in other contexts. I love to get things done so I guess, by your definition, that makes me tactical by nature.

    Thanks!

    Simon