Register early and save on ERE Expo 2010 Spring in San Diego from March 15-17.

Blog Network

Continued Success With Employee Referrals follow this blog post

We've just finished back-to-back years of employee referrals accounting for 75% or more of all external hires.  This has caused me to do a little reflection on our progress, where we are and where we are going with this powerful recruiting strategy.    

The background: AmTrust Bank grew its program from 28% of hires in 2006 to 78% in 2008 and continued the success by sourcing 75% of our hires through employee referrals in fiscal 2009.  We increased our reliance on this source over time as we continued to validate that employee referrals stay longer and cost less than hires from other sources.  Although, as we planned sourcing strategies for fiscal 2009 we knew the year was going to be a tough one.  

The bad news: as we started the fiscal year in October 2008 the economy was a mess, the employed were not inclined to change jobs during such uncertain times and candidates were increasingly wary of joining the struggling financial industry.  Not an easy time to be a recruiter.    

The good news: we had a strong corporate culture, an engaged workforce and the momentum of our employee referral program.  Our internal employee communications team did a great job of sharing positive stories, which our employees could easily incorporate into conversation with family, friends and others in the community.  The employment brand, as facilitated every day by our employees, confirmed that this was a great place to work!     

The reality: we would have to keep the program moving forward without the overt in-your-face internal marketing and generous budget we utilized in the past.  We suspended our monthly participation prizes and annual $5000 grand prize and toned down the "fun" aspects of the program.  Without all of this, we needed a new approach.   

The new marketing approach: a no-nonsense-no-fluff-micro-level strategy.  No more asking employees for all the referrals they could find.  We featured intranet articles describing specific jobs we were recruiting for and only asked for referrals for those jobs.  We directly solicited top performers and recent hires from targeted companies to ask for referrals and encouraged employees to utilize linkedin, facebook and twitter as a means to reach out to top talent in their networks.  The focus became one of business necessity: we need great people, we need your help, and sourcing talent this way has proven results for the organization!  In retrospect, without the strength of our employee driven employment branding and the momentum of our employee referral program, we would not have been able to offset the bad news and fill open positions as easily.   

The future: we know we cannot rest on our past success and that we will need to be even more creative with our program to keep it fresh, relevant, and impactful.  We must continue to upgrade our message and means of encouraging employee participation, as well as find new ways to recognize/reward employees for their efforts.  We continue to listen to and learn from industry experts and other companies about their program success and have significant program upgrades planned for fiscal 2010.  We do expect similar results in the future and are excited about proving that this level of program success is sustainable for years to come.

10 comments

Log in or register to post a reply.

  • 1 point 2 months ago

    Ron,

    Great conversation and topic. Thanks for the continued updates on your successes, and changing strategies.

    Like any marketing progrom, times, resources, and opportunities change, but you have done a great job at adopting and keeping things Fresh and new!

    Sean, Ernest, and Peter, Great comments all.

    Ron, You mentioned that you had some resources for "internal communications" to employees. You might have already mentioned these elsewhere on ERE, but I was wondering what types and how you communicated with your existing employees in the past, and if this new strategy required you and your recruiting team to doing the work emailing, content, etc, or did you have help from marketing, etc.

  • 1 point 2 months ago

    Jonathan,

    Thanks for the kind words. Most of the "internal communications" that I referred to was our employee communication group (resides in HR) which manages the content of our intranet. We would provide some content to them, but they did most of the heavy lifting.  Additionally, recruiters would create targeted communication (e-mail and/or phone calls) to specific employees that we believed would be helpful in our sourcing efforts.  Our Marketing department help came early on with the creation of posters/screen savers, etc

  • 1 point 2 months ago

    Ron, did you provide sample or recommended messages with links for your employees to post and share on linkedin, facebook, twitter, etc..?  Or did you leave it up p to them to write what every they wanted?  Do you have links to any of those posts/tweets? 

  • 1 point 2 months ago

    We did not provide recommended messages.  We believe that it is important for our employees to tell "their" story vs. forwarding a corporatized message.

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Ron,

    Just curious, does the ERP % vary to a significant among different job roles...or is it relatively the same across the board.

    Meaning, is the % higher/the same when you compare loan officers to vice presidents...for example.

    Great work/post, btw.

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Sean,

    Thanks for the comments and the kind words.  We clearly receive a higher volume of referral candidates for more entry level jobs than we do for more senior level jobs.  Interestingly enough, we do not see a significant difference in the actual hire numbers/percentages at the higher job grade levels.  We do more personal solicitation of executives for referrals when we are working on more senior level jobs.

    Ron.

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Agreed, and I don't think it should go higher than what it is now at 75%, but do you or anyone in the organization have any concerns that the current 75% is still a bit too high?

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Pete,

    Our executive leadership team has been very supportive of this effort, and this percentage...because we continue to deliver the results they are looking for.  My recommendation for anyone on this topic would be to continue to grow your program until the results aren't there. 

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Here is my take on this: Great work in boosting the ERP rate. That shows that people trust management, and enjoy working there. (Money always helps as we all know, too)

    Are you concerned at all about the large # of referrals though? 75% is pretty high, especially when industry standards are somewhere in the 35-45% range. I would be concerned about being too skewed towards ER's.

    just my 2 cents.

    Pete Radloff

    www.RecruitingIn3D.wordpress.com

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Pete,

    Thanks for your comments on this post.  Admittedly, I don't think it is realistic for this rate to be much higher. My biggest concern with our success is the fear that recruiters may forget how to source!  We continue to push for our second highest source of hire to be "sourced by recruiter."  As long as our manager satisfaction is high, our retention is higher among referrals, and we postively impact diversity recruiting, I will continue to be a fan of the employee referral!