Run-of-the-mill Innovation follow this blog post
3 comments
Log in or register to post a reply.
-
Because, any tom, dick and harry is starting his/her recruitment firm. It costs least of the infrastructure and overheads. What they fail to understand that there are hundreds of other who are also doing the same. Then what makes them different? Nothing. Hence "sweat-shops"
-
Adwait, I agree with the sweat shop scenario you have painted.
I have one query for you:
What brought this on?
-
Adwait, you have raised a very pertinent issue. As a recruiter for 14yrs now..having seen a couple of 'ups and downs' in the industry, I feel there is a need for corporates to review their empanelling of 'third party consultants'!
- 'the more the merrier' concept of engaging consultants often only increases the work of the inhouse recruiter as every TPR is busy "clocking the resume' first-without entirely validating the profile for the particular role.
-the inhouse recruiter is flooded with so many resumes that he isnt fully 'handson'-and screening them itself becomes another task!That spurs TPR to seek follow up-which is a further drain on the time of a TPR!!
-it has become a fad for the entry level recruiters in the corporates to empanel as many consultants asap-without even evaluating what the comparative strengths are for each consultant.
-when there is pressure on delivery- without exclusivity, it would be difficult for a TPR toadopt innovative methods to reach out to the ideal candidate!

