Register early and save on ERE Expo 2010 Spring in San Diego from March 15-17.

Blog Network

Jonathan Duarte

Interenet Recruiting and job search, meet social media.

Job Seekers: Ignore Social Networking your own peril! follow this blog post

45% of Employers are using Social Networking sites to research job seekers.

CareerBuilder recently polled 2,667 hiring managers about their use of social networking in the recruiting process. The results of the poll are something that every job seeker, no matter what level of experience or industry should come to understand.

The job search rules have changed. The process of simply applying with a resume, no longer exists. Employers have access to the social networking sites. They know how to use them, and they are making hiring decisions based on them. Realize this now, and use it to your advantage, or perish!

Here are some of the results of the poll, and my comments:

45% of the employers in the survey admitted to using social networking sites like LinkedIn.com, Facebook.com, Myspace.com, and twitter.com to research job seekers in their recruiting processes. Another 11% stated they would start this practice this year. In total, that's 56% of employers... a majority!

Personally, I think this number is much higher, especially if you consider some of the recent statistics from Linkedin and that fact that the CareerBuilder study apparently did not include staffing firms and executive recruiters.

In a recent post, LinkedIn recently stated that 40% of Fortune 100 companies have paid LinkedIn Recruiter accounts, meaning these firms are paying LinkedIn to provide better tools for searching, researching, and communicating with job seekers.

Additionally, back in May 2009, LinkedIn stated they had over 500,000 Human Resources and Recruiters as members. And finally, for that last 3 years, "Internet Sourcing" has become a very lucrative training business for consultants who teach employers how to find and track down candidates online.

Employers, staffing firms, and executive recruiters are using LinkedIn, Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter to make hiring decisions.

So, what are employer's doing on these sites? What are they looking for? And what should job seekers be on the lookout for?

35% DID NOT hire a candidate because of what they found online.

Top 7 Reasons Employers Disqualified candidates:

1. Posting provocative or inappropriate photographs or information. Get rid of the non-professional stuff on your MySpace and Facebook sites. If your friends are posted dumb things, defriend them. It's your career and job at stake. Your true friends will get over it.

2. Posting content about the candidate drinking or using drugs. Clean up your act!

3. Bad mouthed their previous employer. Remember what you put online will get out there. Employers will not consider candidates who show traits of insubordination. Granted, social networking isn't about the employer, but your attitude is what employers are viewing. Having a bad attitude will probably follow you, regardless of the employer.

4. Lied about qualifications. Back to square 1, make sure your profile and resume match, including experience, skills, time lines, etc.

5. Shared confidential information from a previous employer. Why would you do this anyways? And then make it public? Be careful of what you say, to whom and when.

6. Showed poor communication skills. While this might seem odd, I have seen a lot of this when visiting a job seekers twitter profile, and then their blog, I find lots of typos, grammatical issues, and a clear lack of proper grammar. (Believe me, I'm no writer either, but check what you publish.)

7. Another 14% of employers disqualified candidates because the candidate used "text messaging" short-hand, like smiley faces and GR8 (great) on their applications or in emails. Remember your audience and medium. Email and your job application require professionalism, not short-hand.

Top 7 Reasons Employer's Hired a candidate after a social screen.

1. Profile provided a good feel for the candidate's personality and fit. This might seem a little odd, but this is one of the biggest reasons employer's are doing social screens in the first place. They want to minimize the risk of a bad hire. If you have a social footprint that matches the companies brand, that's a good thing. If you act professionally online, employer's believe you will act the same way when working for them.

2. Social profiles matched professional qualifications. Again, make sure what is publicly available about you matches your resume. Another hint would be to "google yourself". Type your name into Google Search, and see what comes up.

3. Candidate was creative. Your social profiles will in fact show this.

4. Candidate showed strong communication skills.

5. Candidate was well-rounded. Again, back to the "personality". Employers are looking to see what you do, and how you act in a social setting, even if it is online.

6. Others posted good references about the candidate.

7. Candidate received awards and accolades.

What to do next?

If you are searching for a job, and you are concerned about the above, the good news is this... You can do something about it. It doesn't take long, and it's pretty easy:

1. Get on LinkedIn, complete your profile, and make sure that your profile matches what your resume says.

2. Get on Facebook, and if you are already on Facebook, make sure you delete any non-professional images, notes, wall posts, comments, and anything else that might cause an employer to discredit you.

3. Get on Twitter, and start Tweeting about your job search and your professional expertise.

4. Google yourself, to know what employers are going to find out about you.

While there are a lot of other things you can be doing, the above 4 steps are basic, yet critical

Additionally, don't let any of the statistics above scare you. Profiles and social networking sites give you a lot of control over the content and messages. You can block users, delete messages, etc. But you must be vigilant!

In summary, remember that what you put online can be re-published instantly and ubiquitously. So, if you don't want your mother to read it on the front of the New York Times, don't put it online. It doesn't matter if it's your Facebook page or tweeting with friends, we are talking about your career and your personal brand.

 

9 comments

Log in or register to post a reply.

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Good advice & comments. Certainly the lesson here is that electronic privacy is a myth.

    SmartSearch & many of the other leading talent acquisition systems now offer built-in research tools including ability to find candidates on LinkedIn, Google, etc. That's because more & more recruiters are preferring "best fit" candidate over "most qualified" and looking at an individuals digital footprint has become part of the screening process. 

    I advise anyone using email, social networks, writing a blog, etc to remember the 3 M's: Never post or transmit anything that you wouldn't want your Mother, the Media, or your Mentors (friends, coworkers, boss, neighbors, etc) to see.

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    In the age of internet the amount of privacy we have is shrinking every year, and I think it's ok.

    We all learn to respect each other differences.

    Still it's better not go into extreme when differentiating yourself.

     

     

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    I agree as well that everyone should be careful of what they post on the internet. But I would advocate that employers are seeking out this information. Coming from the employer side we do not encourage our hiring managers to seek out this information because we do not want it to bias the decision nor do we want any legal implications based on a hiring decision made from something found on the web. So from the candidate side, yes you should always be careful what you post or have written about you on the web. Many internal recruiters, just like myself, seek out potential prospects by surfing the web for potential blogs, web pages, articles, etc. that link to a great candidate. But for companies thinking about googling every candidate they have in the interview process...I just advise that you proceed with caution!

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    The irony is killing me.  Timely post on FB privacy.

     

    http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/5_easy_steps_to_stay_safe_and_private_on_facebook.php

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    This is very true and as these social networks continue to grow it will become common place to check into a candidates network to gather additional information. It is important for all of us to stay aware and know what comes when our name is googled.

    In regards to Peter's comment you are right that we will eventually see some type of law suits due to the availability of this personal information which is unfortunate. 

    I do believe that a company has the right to base decisions on information found on social networks.  Most employers are looking for respectful, responsible and ethical individuals to fill their needs and if a candidates social network is providing pictures of the latest beer bong party this will give a wrong impression.  It is comparable to Miss America and nude photos taken years before she is awarded the crown.  Is she the most suitable candidate?  I think employers should be able to make those decisions, but as with most things it will be fought at some point.

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    I see some merit in that - especially if we're talking a government job. BUT, at what point is there a separation of church and state?

    If you have a job that requires no client facing time, etc. What does it matter what you do on your personal time? I think that is where the water gets murky.  (Of course, as I write this I think of how often I police my own profile). How is what you do (or did 10 years ago) in your personal life relevant to the job you applied for. I'm sure you can make some case, but do we then worry that someone won't be hired because their religious preferences are on FB too?

    It's a slippery slope, and I would rather watch the fallout than be in it. 

    Bottom line is use common sense. If you don't want people seeing it, don't have it to be seen. But we need to better police what employers make decisions on. Otherwise we just set ourselves back 30 years.

  • 0 points 6 months ago

    I totally agree with you and understand the concerns.  Our world has become so accessible to everyone there is no hiding any more.  I think of information that is reported today about celebrities, government officials and even the details on the war and wonder if we are provided too much information and too much access to everything good and bad.

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    I agree that both things are important: 1) Expose yourself online in a good way.

    2) Don't do questionable things online.

    I think in a few years it might be unusual to hire high-profile candidates that don't have online footprint.

     

  • 1 point 6 months ago

    Jonathan,

    Good topic.

    I agree with much of what you said about not having poor communication, making sure the profiles match, and not having "taboo" things on the social profiles.

    But the key factor here is that with Facebook, MySpace (their time is limited in this world), etc. You can keep your profile PRIVATE! That way, only your "friends" can see all of your profile. That is common sense 101.

    As for employers, mark my words.....there will be one that gets sued for looking at these profiles. There has not been a case of this yet, but really, how far away can it be? I think that there should be a caution for employers to avoid social media at their own peril - in SOME ways.  Definitely use it to promote your company (tweets, FB pages, etc.)

    I feel strongly that sourcing from these is going to create a firestorm of lawsuits eventually. We are a litigious society, and its inevitable.