See who is already coming to #socialrecruiting summit in November!

Blog Network

Hire Calling

What's on my mind.

Should your outside-of-work-online persona be considered by employers? follow this blog post

imageBig Bad Recruiting Blog Swap... My name is Tod Hilton and I will be your host for this post. What I am: a software developer at Microsoft and a bunch of other things [father, husband, gamer, snowboarder, etc.]. What I?m not: a recruiter or hiring manager, although I do interview candidates and give the infamous ?hire? or ?no-hire? recommendation.

I am going to segue off of David?s previous post, Students, careers & social networking, and give you my thoughts on the murky waters of... Should a person?s personal, ?outside-of-work? persona be considered by an employer? My answer: yes and no. :-) I know, you?re probably thinking ?what a typical ambiguous answer from yet another corporate drone,? but you couldn?t be further from the truth.

First of all, as an interviewer I do search for candidate information online. College papers, blogs, personal hobby sites, forum posts, yada-yada-yada. I think you can find some very valuable stuff out there. For instance, if we?re interviewing someone who has a blog then I can get some real insight into their thoughts over a period of time versus a 60 minute interview. In the case of software development, it?s a real boon if they have a web site that showcases some personal projects they have tackled. There isn?t room for extra stuff like this on a resume, but it can really sway an interviewer?s opinion.

So back to my ?yes-and-no? answer...

The ?NO? side: I believe very strongly that everyone should be allowed to express their own opinions/beliefs. I wouldn?t even bother blogging if I couldn?t state my own opinions; it would be a complete waste of my time. Along with that, for the most part I feel that those opinions really should not be considered by prospective employers. For example, I can believe wholeheartedly in the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and still give 110% at work. I can also be a video game addict [where?s the local chapter meeting this week?] while also delivering above-and-beyond my commitments at work. We?re all individuals and our employers should not only recognize that, but embrace it.

The ?YES? side: Even though we should all be allowed to express our own opinions and beliefs, that doesn?t give us the right to do so in a disrespectful manner. We all have different opinions, but [in my opinion :-)] mature people can discuss them in a respectful way without being insulting, condescending or belittling. In keeping with my Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) example...� If someone were to have a web site dedicated to spreading the FSM gospel that?s fine and dandy. But if they did so in a way that insulted, cajoled or belittled all other religions then I would begin to wonder what kind of person are they. Are they going to handle work conflicts the same way, by simply attacking everyone around them? Will they be able to resolve conflicts through compromises or will they only be able to see their perspective and never reach a resolution?� I?m sure you see where I?m going with this...

You might consider the persona you present online to be personal and none of your employer?s business, but you also need to remember that your personal actions reflect on you as a whole. At Microsoft, it?s an important part of the hiring process to make sure that candidates are compatible with our company values. Anything you put online about yourself has the potential to influence this process, whether or not that is your intention.

I want to leave you with one final thought. Remember that whatever you post on the internet will live a long, long time...maybe even forever! Public forums, web sites, blogs and newsgroups are archived by several companies (i.e.: Google) so before you hit that ?Submit? button keep in mind that whatever you just wrote will still be available in 1, 2, 5, 10 years.

~tod

7 comments

Log in or register to post a reply.

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    [Posted verbatim by The Canadian Headhunter]

    I think at this point I'll slide over into the "agree to disagree" lane and let you pass me on the left. :)

    You obviously have strong opinions on the subject (as do I) and I'm glad that you shared them. Something that didn't get brought up in this post is the flip-side...

    jobseekers doing online research of potential employers. Here's an interesting article at TechDirt: http://techdirt.com/articles/20060713/0948251.shtml

    Food for thought, eh. :) Really, that's what its all about...

    getting people to think for themselves and then discuss it. One more quick point to make... You state that after your comments you "...could forget about an opportunity of ever working at Microsoft huh?" Quite the contrary!

    I have seen several people get hired at Microsoft because they were willing to state their opinions and stand by them.

    A good manager will respect someone more for stating their contrarian opinion (in a respectful manner!) than being a yes-man/woman.

    Personally, I prefer working with people who think differently than I do because when we come together we end up with ideas and solutions that any one of us individually would never have thought of.

    That's one of the amazing aspects of the diversity found at Microsoft and thousands of other companies!

    Thanks again to the Canadian Headhunter for posting my comment!

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    tod knows how to roll with the punches

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    [These remarks are from the tod (verbatim) and are merely posted via the Canadian Headhunter]

    Boy, thanks everyone for the comments! I?m really glad to see the discussion that has ensued. Good stuff!

    Remember, my answer to the question was yes AND no. The bottom line I want to get across is that we all need to be aware of the world we live in and realistic about its usage. The internet is a public domain. As individuals we should always keep this in mind when posting something online. Think of it this way, would you run around your neighborhood, office or school shouting out ?the Seattle Seahawks suck? or ?the Pittsburgh Steelers rock? in your loudest voice? Because that?s what you?re doing whenever you post something online?whether you intend to or not. With regard to the question of whether or not employers should consider this information?see my response to Karen below.

    And now for the individual replies?

    Heather- Thanks, but no thanks. As I said in a comment on your blog?just give me Visual Studio and a good functional spec so I can write some code. :)

    Scott- I think someone who is going to be a ?public face? for any company should pay even closer attention to what they do online.

    George- The benefits are most certainly mixed and in my opinion the worth is up to the individual recruiter/hiring manager to decide.

    Cheryl- Yes, a very slippery slope indeed. I?m an open minded person, at least I like to think so, and feel that I can differentiate between insightful versus inciteful (nice pun, btw :). Obviously the difference will vary for everyone and that?s where we really start to slip-n-slide as the practice is applied with different principles in mind.

    Karen- Boy, that was a mouthful wasn?t it. :) I think comparisons to witch-hunting and McCarthyism are a bit extreme and would not be the general application. At least I would hope not. I agree wholeheartedly that a person?s personal life shouldn?t matter if it doesn?t affect their ability to perform their job. That?s the rub?as long as it doesn?t affect their ability to perform their job. Let me give a scenario using software development as an example, say I want to hire the best person for the job and [living in reality] that means more than someone who knows how to code inside and out. It means someone who can communicate with non-technical people, who is willing to share their code with other developers so the whole team can benefit, who is willing to visit mistakes (their own and others) in a non-confrontational way that will allow everyone to benefit. There are a lot more, but those are some highlights of what I would like to see. If a candidate has a public blog in which he/she discusses their current work situation and they describe really ugly, unresolved confrontations with co-workers then as an interviewer/recruiter I would be stupid not to address that. They screamed it out to the world and now I?m using that information to make an educated/informed decision?not to discriminate. Do I want someone in my group that cannot resolve conflicts? Do I want someone who could create a bunch of churn between co-workers? Would that person spend more time creating conflicts than getting features coded? All of those could potentially destroy my group?s morale, cohesiveness and ability to even deliver a product. How's that for a mouthful? ;-)

    I also recommend you check out Louise Fletcher?s post, Online Personal Brands (http://www.exceler8ion.com/2006/07/07/blogswap-week-1-louise-fletchers-take-on-online-personal-brands/), as she gives a very succinct opinion on the subject.

    Thanks to the Canadian Headhunter for posting my comment since I didn?t want to create [yet another] login/user id to keep track of [or more likely forget about].

    Louise Fletcher

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    It is SUCH a slippery slope. We all know heavy internet users who can search and find anything on the web. So quietly, this is already done by the very web savviest recruiters in the business. We simply can't regulate and ensure what information is deemed "helpful" or insightful, or which information might just be...inciteful.

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    My younger colleagues and the candidates I talk to find the idea that their musings in cyberspace might be subject to scrutiny extremely disturbing. As such, as the war for talent heats up, this practice (or even the perception of it) would have a devastating impact on an employer's reputation/brand. Not worth the mixed benefits that Tod so aptly summarizes, IMHO.

    George Blomgren http://employment.typepad.com

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    I don't think I can give a 100% yes or no on this one. But I am leaning more towards the yes. While I agree that someone should be able to do what they want outside of the office... what they choose to do in public is a totally different situation. If I am recruiting for someone to be in a "face of the company" position... they need to be able to portray the company values and ideals at all times when in the public.

    Oh.. and for your final thought... I can still find old USENET postings I did 14 years ago.. scary...

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    Look at you posting on a recruiting blog. I love it!

    Watch out, you might get sucked into the vortex and become one of "us" ; )