See who is already coming to #socialrecruiting summit in November!

Blog Network

The Recruitment Revolution: How Technology and Specialization Are Changing the Game follow this blog post

Recruitment has changed. No, I am not just talking about Lou Adler's "hub and spoke" sourcing model, although there is a connection. Even just a few short years ago, recruitment at most companies consisted of a one stop shop with the words "human resources" stamped across the front door. Especially at smaller companies, Human Resource Coordinators and Assistants doubled as recruiters. As I review the resumes of many of the newly unemployed HR professionals, they have a mixing bowl of experience. Managing open enrollment is often listed right above planning company events and "recruiting top talent." They are puzzled to receive generic rejection emails after applying to recruiting openings, as after all, they did manage recruitment strategies along with new hire orientation and exit interviews. So what has changed that makes their experience not measure up to the competition? In two words: specialization and technology.

Finding the best candidates no longer amounts to simply scanning applications and buying licensure lists to send out mailings. Even the so called "boomerang" campaigns have lost their charm. My husband would laugh to hear me say this, but recruiters have become a new brand of detective. Think I am exaggerating? Consider the manual process that recruiters must go through to source great passive candidates. It often begins on Bing, Yahoo or Google with a Boolean string targeting company and association publications. Once a name is found, the first stop becomes people search engines such as Pipl or Yahoo People Search. If you are lucky, there is only one Joe Smith in Chicago, Illinois, and his home phone number is listed above his address. Or maybe he is on LinkedIn, and you can shoot him a quick InMail plugging your exciting opportunity at Employer XYZ. If not, it is back to the drawing board.

Further searches uncover the domain name of his current employer, and a coworker's email address suggests that his email mail be joe.smith@employerxyz.com. You give it a shot, and it works. Great, but not good enough; time to find a personal email address and phone number. A targeted search reveals that Joe is the coach of his daughter's soccer team, and has created a web page to house an updated schedule and team photos. It also contains a contact phone number. Does it belong to Joe? A reverse phone lookup reveals that the cell phone number is currently registered to a Joe Smith in Chicago, Illinois. Jack pot. All-in-all, it may have taken anywhere from 20 minutes to an hour to find information for a single passive candidate.

This is just one process that a modern recruiter goes through to source talent. Remember I also mentioned technology as being an important ingredient in the evolution of recruiting? Now programs like Broadlook are automating some of these manual processes (side note: I am a huge fan), but as the majority of companies are either unaware of these developments, or unwilling to pay for them, recruiters are still pounding the online pavement. When technologies like Broadlook become main stream (and I believe they will eventually), the role of the recruiter will change yet again. In addition to mastering a myriad of programs, they will have to master something that has been around a lot longer: time. How do recruiters function effectively when they have great leads to follow up on coming in from a variety of sources, candidate relationships to maintain, pipelines to develop, phone screens to complete, interviews to schedule, offers to make... Is a role this diverse one that should be handled by one recruiter, or many?

My vote would be for many. There are only so many hats a recruiter can wear before quality of hire is sacrificed. The result: another evolution in recruiting. In the very near future, I believe recruiting will become entirely fragmented, with common functions segmented into different roles. This can already be seen in the emergence of roles dedicated to candidate sourcing, brand management and social media strategies. The recruitment revolution has just begun, and the companies leading it will be those striving to build a diversely talented workforce while simultaneously delivering exceptional customer service, something which, sadly, is often ignored in recruitment. Doing so means adapting your model to incorporate changing methods of communication. Excited?

 

5 comments

Log in or register to post a reply.

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Ross,

    I could not agree with you more! I think that many recruiters are overly nervous about technology evolving to the point where their job can be done by a program or platform. I do think that sourcing can be automated in many ways, but the first call made to the the passive candidate (or the ones that follow) cannot ever be automated. Communication with candidates is vital, which is why I champion the use of programs like Twitter. The immediacy and personalization it enables is incredible!

    Thanks for taking the time to comment!

    Emily

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Agree, Emily. Specialization will be become more common within recruitment, technology will become more accurate, cheap and widespread. But, as Maureen so accurately points out, the skilled human side of sourcing/recruitment also increases in importance and performs a role that no amount of technology will ever make redundant. 

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Emily, here's one:

    On Monday, make a list of companies you'd like to hire out of.  Take the afternoon off.  You're gonna need to rest.

    On Tuesday, call in to each one and find the people with the title/or those who are responsible for the same duties as the one you're looking to hire. 50 names is a pretty good number to fill a  list with.  It'll probably take you all day.

    On Wednesday and Thursday , pitch your opportunity directly to each person.  Start early and work all day, every day. 

    On Friday, expect to receive a resume or two.  Continue the call/pitching that day and the following week to the persons you did not reach the previous week.  Cultivate some more the ones from the previous week who said they'd "think about it" or talk to their spouses about it.  Oh, yeah, and don't forget to call back the ones who said they'd send a resume but didn't.  Expect to receive more resumes this week.  By the end of the week expect to have a placement pretty much in place.   

    As you become more and more attuned to this process the cycles will shorten and, of course, if you specialize, they will shorten even more. Telephone names souricng MAY BE the only process out there with constantly increasing rates of return. 

    I wrote a little something about this process this past weekend on a search I am involved in.  You can read it here.

    (You may need to join the MagicMethod Telephone Sourcing network over on ning to read this - don't worry - it's FREE and you'll be joining over 1500 other sourcers interested in the subject!)

    Oh, and there's something I agree with - your team model.

    This will shorten (and is shortening) the hiring cycle (even more) in the few organizations that are currently using it.  It requires, however, buy-in from all the team members that most candidates sourced the telephone way are truly (no ifs, ands or butts abt it) passive candidates and require a unique handling approach.  You don't call them and ask them what their salary requirements are.  Remember, the greater majority of them are really not looking for a job!  Grasping this difference, understanding and acting upon it constructively is what, in the future, will differentiate great recruiters. 

    Start with one person sourcing, two calling/developing the potential candidates, another handling the customer and the candidate presentation.  The presentation may require a blend of talents between the candidate developer and the person handling the customer.  Soon, add another candidate developer because the pipeline a skilled telephone sourcer provides will soon overflow if you have only two candidate developers handling it.  Next, add another person who handles the customer - these people should also be navigating the byways for new customers.  A team of six could be the maximum number that works before a new team is assembled.

    ******

    Our goal is to save you time and help you succeed.

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Maureen-


    I love the sourcing method that you suggested, and will also pass it along (as well as the link to your article) to the recruiters who I work with. As always, you are full of great ideas!! I cannot stress enough how much I admire recruiters who are juggling so many distinct roles right now. This seems to be especially prevalent in healthcare right now, as the req loads are amazingly high for what you would expect in this economy.

    I appreciate you taking the time to comment!!

    Emily

  • 1 point 3 months ago

    Thanks Emily and also let me thank you for taking the time to comment back to me!  It's one of the niceties I often neglect in my own postings to my readers and I am sorry to say that.  Your courtesy is lovely.