See who is already coming to #socialrecruiting summit in November!

Blog Network

DC Recruiting

On this ERE Blog you'll find entries from Scott Kahle on new trends, new product and insights on the state of the employment market here in Washington, DC. Since these are all my personal opinions, I always welcome comments from my readers and encourage you to challenge anything I post to this Blog.

Tell me what YOU think about…

Recruiting Explorationist follow this blog post

 

 I recently had a friend in the business ask me how it is that every time we talk recruiting; I introduce a new product or solution that's just hit, or is just about to hit, the market. His point was this:

 

"Rather than testing out every new product to hit the market, why not wait 6 months to see if it takes off and then use the product once it's tested and proven?"

 

My friend (let?s call him Mike) makes a good point, but I'll counter with the following thought:

 

As an early adopter of new recruiting products, I often get the chance to talk with the creator/inovator directly about the vision they have for thier product and explore what problem they hope it will solve. From that conversation two things happen that I like.

  1. I get to think about the problem in a way I may not have considered before.
  2. I have an opportunity to influence the features and functionality of the product while it's still in the development stages.

Most of the product I try out don't find a permanent place in my recruiting tool kit. However, for the ones that do make my job easier in the long run it's great to have a relationship with the creator that reaches back to the launch of the product.

 

Plus, I'm a gadget guy and I love to play with the latest toys...

 
image

1 comment

Log in or register to post a reply.

  • 1 point 3 years ago

    ...the reality is that most organizations do not have time to evaluate most things, so waiting until something rises above the clutter, which is due to: good buzz because the product is special in some respects and some early adopters are singing the praises, they got lucky with VC funding and they have $ to create their own buzz, or both. Folks should be glad there are early adopters like Scott around, and he's quite right that you get extra influence on product development when you sign on early with a vendor, and typically at lower cost. The question is whether your firm can justify the time and effort expended to be a guinea pig for savings that won't really end up being savings if the vendor fails to implement well (or goes bankrupt entirely). That is the risk one takes to be a leader!